Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

362 .APPENDIX. [VOL. I. [E.c.] 1881 McFARLANE y. THE QUEEN. may 25 . Non-liability of the Croton for the negligence of its servantsCrown not a common carrierPayment of statutory dues. [s.c.] 1882 The suppliants, by petition of right, claimed payment of certain losses May 13. sustained by them arising from the breaking of a boom, at the
VOL. I.] APPENDIX. 363 mouth of the Madawaska river, owned by the Dominion Govern- 1881-2 ment as a public work and constructed for the purpose of facilitat- MOF ARLANE ing the transmission of saw logs, &c., down the Ottawa river. ti Suppliants were carrying on lumber operations on the Madawaska THE QUEEN. river, and certain timber and logs owned by them passed into the Government boom at the mouth of the Madawaska. They alleged that the boom-master, by reason of the unskilful, negligent and improper manner in which he performed his duty, allowed a larger quantity of timber and logs than the boom was capable of holding to pass into it, in consequence of which the boom broke and the timber and logs of the suppliant floated out. Some of the logs were lost and suppliants were put to expenses in recovering others. Suppliants also allege that the boom was negligently and unskilfully constructed. The Crown demurred to the petition of right in effect upon the grounds that no contract between the suppliants and Ha' Majesty was shown therein, and that in the absence of a contract in respect of which the negligence of the boom-master arose, damages therefor could not be recovered against the Crown. Held, per Henry, J. (in the Exchequer Court), that there was an implied contract on the part of the Crown for the carriage of the logs by water, and over-ruled the demurrer. On appeal to the Supreme Court of Canada,— Held, (reversing the judgment of the Exchequer Court) : 1st. That a petition of right does not lie to recover compensation from the Crown for damage occasioned by the negligence of its servants to the property of an individual using a public work. 2nd. That an express or implied contract is not created with the Crown because an individual pays rolls imposed by statute for the use of a public work, such as slide dues for passing his logs through government slides. 3rd. That in such a case Her Majesty cannot be held liable as a common carrier. See Can. S. C. R., vol. VII., p. 216.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.