Judgments

Decision Information

Decision Content

T-1780-77
William and Tabitha Smith (Plaintiffs) v.
The Queen and the Attorney General of Canada (Defendants)
Trial Division, Mahoney J.—Vancouver, October 24, 25 and 27; Ottawa, November 4, 1977.
Jurisdiction — Prerogative writs — Writ of quo warranto sought re Yukon magistrate's authority — Magistrate appointed pursuant to territorial ordinance — Ordinance's legislative competence in turn due to Yukon Act — Whether or not territorial magistrate's court a federal tribunal and there fore within Federal Court's jurisdiction — Federal Court Act,
R.S.C. 1970 (2nd Supp.), c. 10, s. 18 Magistrate's Court Ordinance, O.Y.T. 1971 (1st), c. 10 — Yukon Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. Y-2, as amended by R.S.C. 1970 (1st Supp.), c. 48, ss. 6 and 12, and SOR/71-130 — Interpretation Act, R.S.C. 1970, c. 1-23.
APPLICATION. COUNSEL:
W. Smith for himself and Tabitha Smith. J. R. Haig for defendants.
SOLICITORS:
W. Smith, Old Crow, for himself and Tabitha Smith.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada for defendants.
The following are the reasons for judgment rendered in English by
MAHONEY J.: The plaintiffs seek a writ of quo warranto in respect of the authority of one Wil- liam Pierce and others generally to act, in Her Majesty's name, as magistrates of the Magistrate's Court of the Yukon Territory. The defendants have, by leave, entered a conditional appearance for the purpose of questioning this Court's jurisdic tion to entertain the action.
The magistrates in issue are appointed by the Commissioner of the Yukon Territory pursuant to the Magistrate's Court Ordinance' which, in turn,
I O.Y.T. 1971 (1st), c. 10.
would appear to be within the legislative compe tence of the Territorial Council only by virtue of paragraph 16(i) of the Yukon Act 2 .
Under section 18 of the Federal Court Act 3 , this Court has exclusive jurisdiction to grant the relief sought if these magistrates fall within the defini tion of "federal board, commission or other tribu nal" in the Federal Court Act, which is:
2. In this Act
"federal board, commission or other tribunal" means any body or any person or persons having, exercising or purporting to exercise jurisdiction or powers conferred by or under an Act of the Parliament of Canada, other than any such body constituted or established by or under a law of a province or any such person or persons appointed under or in accordance with a law of a province or under section 96 of The British North America Act, 1867;
The powers and jurisdiction of these magistrates may be conferred under an Act of the Parliament of Canada, the Yukon Act, but their court is constituted and they are appointed under an Ordi nance of the Council of the Yukon Territory.
The Interpretation Act 4 provides:
28. In every enactment
"province" means a province of Canada, and includes the Yukon Territory and the Northwest Territories;
That, of course, applies to the Federal Court Act.
The magistrates of the Magistrate's Court of the Yukon Territory, in general, and William Pierce, in particular, are not, by definition, a "federal board, commission or other tribunal" by reason of the express exclusion from that term of a body constituted and persons appointed under the law of a province. This Court has no jurisdiction to enter tain the action.
JUDGMENT
The action is dismissed with costs.
a R.S.C. 1970, c. Y-2, as amended by R.S.C. 1970 (1st Supp.), c. 48, ss. 6 and 12 and SOR/71-130.
3 R.S.C. 1970 (2nd Supp.), c. 10.
4 R.S.C. 1970, c. I-23.
 You are being directed to the most recent version of the statute which may not be the version considered at the time of the judgment.